Comments on: POASC Manager Suspended without Pay

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:45:45 +0000

In my opinion, Mr. Hodge you are absolutely correct. I applaud your insight and judgement as well as those of our present board.

By: Sandra

Sandra — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:35:14 +0000

I noticed that too Dick – too complicated. I’ll see what I can do.

By: Dick Junkins

Dick Junkins — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:37:33 +0000

Well, Sandra, one thing I’ve noticed about this new format is that if one uses the “Reply” function too deeply into the post, their response becomes more and more difficult to read. Case in point, Wally Hodge’s last Reply.

As for content, I’ve decided to take Sally’s advice and move in a more forward-looking direction. Life’s too damn short to get wrapped around the axle on something that, in the final analysis, doesn’t amount to much.

By: W Hodge

W Hodge — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:09:18 +0000

Renaming an wrongful act does not change the substantive matter. If someone steals it is theft. Naming it an error in judgement doesn’t change the nature of the act. In my estimation all wrongful acts are errors in judgement. Some errors in judgement, picking the wrong paint color for the front porch are not illegal. Some are, such as Mr. Davison’s use of our money without our permission. Did he sit at his desk and consider the act and decide it was an appropriate act? If so he did indeed make an error in judgement and decided on a course of theft. Money stolen for just a short time is still stolen money even if it is repaid. The error in judgement in this matter casts doubts on his ability to make judgments and his termination is proper.

By: Jim Plummer Sr.

Jim Plummer Sr. — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:23:05 +0000

Sally,
You and I have always been on the same wave-link. Keep on “keepin on” with your good work!!!!. I do hope that a effort to see if the sewer charge is recended to a reasonable monthly rate. We have been “ripped off” at the present rate for too long!!!
Best Wishes,
Jim P.

By: Frank Lennox

Frank Lennox — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:47:49 +0000

Jenny: I understand that Joan Fletcher settled with Charlie after consulting with our new lawyer and both sides were happy. I wasnot involved in this and have no idea ifhis defaulting on his contract if he did had any effect on his settlement. Thank God I am out of this mess. Have a happy weekend.

By: Jenny

Jenny — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:13:50 +0000

Hi Frank, Good to hear from you. I hope you and Pat are o.k. I have one question. If Charlie defaulted on the contract, does he give up the benefits?

By: ben

ben — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:44:11 +0000

Materiality

By: Dave Danson

Dave Danson — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:08:06 +0000

Ben, does it really make any difference as to when and where the discussion was held. The important thing, it seems to me, is that we both agree that in some form it is a good idea.

By: ben

ben — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:06:51 +0000

I introduced the idea in Wayne’s office, in your presence. Long before we got interested in Sushi.