<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Clubhouse Rentals; Reservations Only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/</link>
	<description>Spanish Cove, our little piece of paradise in Lillian, AL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:29:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Haynes</title>
		<link>http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/comment-page-1/#comment-7336</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/#comment-7336</guid>
		<description>I recall that one of the more challenging things about working daytime security was keeping track of contractor activities. The $40 fee was the source of most displeasure among (some) temporary contractor’s unfamiliar with Spanish Cove’s managed living environment. The main office was frequently tested by these short-term workers as well. It’s understandable that they wouldn’t care to pay a fee when there would be limited prospects of returning for additional work. On the other hand, if you had, say a dozen jobs in SC over the course of a year, you’re expense would only be about $3.00 per job while the residents could be endorsing your work &amp; limiting your competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall that one of the more challenging things about working daytime security was keeping track of contractor activities. The $40 fee was the source of most displeasure among (some) temporary contractor’s unfamiliar with Spanish Cove’s managed living environment. The main office was frequently tested by these short-term workers as well. It’s understandable that they wouldn’t care to pay a fee when there would be limited prospects of returning for additional work. On the other hand, if you had, say a dozen jobs in SC over the course of a year, you’re expense would only be about $3.00 per job while the residents could be endorsing your work &amp; limiting your competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Junkins</title>
		<link>http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/comment-page-1/#comment-7333</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Junkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/#comment-7333</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the typos. That&#039;s what happens when a hunt-and-peck typist types in poor lighting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the typos. That&#8217;s what happens when a hunt-and-peck typist types in poor lighting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Junkins</title>
		<link>http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/comment-page-1/#comment-7332</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Junkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/#comment-7332</guid>
		<description>Just for info, Section 3.14 of the POASC Operating Procedures lists a $35 &quot;Contractor Permit&quot; Fee. I can&#039;t find any mention of the $40 Fee that has now been rescinded, but the anecdotal evidence suggests it was imposed after Ivan as an ayyemot to protect property owners form fly-by-night fraudulemt contractors. In any case, we apparently need to  update our documentation. Our POASC documents are replete with contradictions and are so complex it&#039;s a wonder that anyone can have a full grasp of Spanish Cove rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for info, Section 3.14 of the POASC Operating Procedures lists a $35 &#8220;Contractor Permit&#8221; Fee. I can&#8217;t find any mention of the $40 Fee that has now been rescinded, but the anecdotal evidence suggests it was imposed after Ivan as an ayyemot to protect property owners form fly-by-night fraudulemt contractors. In any case, we apparently need to  update our documentation. Our POASC documents are replete with contradictions and are so complex it&#8217;s a wonder that anyone can have a full grasp of Spanish Cove rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Danson</title>
		<link>http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/comment-page-1/#comment-7331</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Danson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/#comment-7331</guid>
		<description>I have learned not to believe everything that the person who told you that said, Jim.  There are some very small local contractors too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have learned not to believe everything that the person who told you that said, Jim.  There are some very small local contractors too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Haynes</title>
		<link>http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/comment-page-1/#comment-7330</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coveconnections.com/2010/01/26/no-clubhouse-rentals-reservations-only/#comment-7330</guid>
		<description>I remember being told the $40 contractor fee was established to discourage &quot;fly by night&quot; operator&#039;s from exploiting SC residents especially after severe storms. The fee was thought to be minuscule for locally known &amp; respected contractor&#039;s, but enough of a deterrent to stop opportunist&#039;s...dead in their tracks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember being told the $40 contractor fee was established to discourage &#8220;fly by night&#8221; operator&#8217;s from exploiting SC residents especially after severe storms. The fee was thought to be minuscule for locally known &amp; respected contractor&#8217;s, but enough of a deterrent to stop opportunist&#8217;s&#8230;dead in their tracks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
